A Range Of Opinions About 360 Assessment Applications That You May Not Have Considered

Secure the best 360 assessment applications for your needs with our beneficial compendium.

Subordinates observe, and are affected, by managerial behaviors and decisions in ways which are not always evident to supervisors, especially leadership behaviors the “Boss” may seldom see demonstrated by the manager. In fact, supervisory feedback may primarily reflect the performance of the manager’s work unit, rather than leadership behaviors. That is, the supervisor may draw inferences from the performance of the work unit as opposed to actually observing a manager’s behavior. The key thing to do with negative data in a 360 degree feedbacksession is to make sure the participants keep the doors open and their mind open to what it might mean. Usually the truly upsetting conclusions are only answered in proper dialogue in real life, not looking at a personal 360 degree feedbackreport. The respondents in a 360 degree project are often arranged into groups depending on the relationship they have with the appraisee; for example senior, peer, junior, client. This gives the appraisee an all round (hence 360 degree) view of his /her performance. It works particularly well in flexible organisations where the appraisee may be part of several teams or work autonomously and the line manager may not have full visibility of the contribution he / she makes. While feedback from adjacent people can be helpful in finding better ways for employees to interact with coworkers or clients, coworkers and subordinates don’t have all the information an employee’s direct manager has. Therefore, these possible inaccuracies can create a false picture and bias. 360 degree feedbackcreates a confidential and comprehensive way to provide important information and different perspectives to leaders that they would likely never receive otherwise. And it goes beyond the individual benefits of personal development. Team dynamics improve, peer relationships become stronger, and the organization is able to reinforce a consistent manager experience for employees. For these business relationships to be effective, the constituencies consisting of other 360-degree feedback raters also should have an important voice, that is, a voice in defining successful job performance and an important source from whom feedback should be sought. The employee's manager becomes a valuable coaching resource in this rater-picking process. This will ensure that the other raters who are picked for input indeed represent significant work interdependencies rather than popularity contests that may have little to do with the employee's work.



Throughout a 360 degree feedbacksession, there is the uncertainty about how exposed the data is going to be – the key question being: “Will the focus be able to spot that it is me saying this? ” The answer to this of course depends on the construction of your survey and reporting parameters. And the truth is that, even with a lot of reviewers with only averages shown, it is possible that it will be clear that everyone has rated a few things really badly. The 360 degree feedbackprocess typically works best with a two-step implementation, starting with developmental feedback and then migrating to performance management. After employees have used the process for development and like it, they naturally ask for the process to be applied to pay and performance decisions. The multisource assessment process is such a significant change in the performance model that incremental applications enhance users' understanding. Users usually readily accept multisource systems through this approach. If 360-degree feedback is to effectively serve as a self-development process, it must be integrated into the work and development system at both the individual and the organizational level. This way, development activities are not separated from the work that needs to be done but will serve important work needs for the individual and the organization. At the same time, important work assignments will provide the needed opportunities for continued development. The more perspectives you seek out in the 360 degree process – the less likely your reviews are to fall prey to unconscious bias. Unfortunately, bias does creep into the review process – with men more likely to receive evidenced feedback on technical skills than women. Keeping up with the latest developments regarding 360 feedback software is a pre-cursor to Increased employee motivation and building the link between performance and rewards.

Benefits Of The 360 Degree Process

Additional training for reviewees on how to choose their reviewers more effectively is recommended which requires resources. If you don’t want to organize a full training, you can create a short guide for reviewees. Also, the ease of use of the interface of 360-degree feedback software may reduce the likelihood of errors in the selection of reviewers. At the HR level, 360 degree group data provides a broader look at the organization and its cultural health. You can use it to identify group development priorities and spot any highly problematic areas that need additional intervention. Survey development, also called instrument development, is often the most difficult and lengthiest task of the 360 degree feedbackproject because of the importance in achieving content validity and user support. One excellent way to select the competencies for the survey is to organize a focus groupa cross-functional group of employees from various organizational levels who will use the 360 degree feedbacksystem. A 360 assessment also helps managers provide their virtual staff with constructive criticism on an ongoing basis, which can help avoid major problems down the road. This is similar to what happens when you implement a constructive feedback tool. Collecting and reviewing the feedback you receive for each employee can be a very time-consuming process. It can be tedious to enter data into your systems. However, with the assistance of automation and digital tools, HR leaders can significantly cut back on time. The best review systems integrate well with your other software systems and offer access to data in real-time. Looking into 360 degree feedback can be a time consuming process.

Employees might be more comfortable asking questions in person in a 360 feedback session than in writing, and they’re more likely to take bad news well if they can talk through the problems instead of stewing or feeling like they've been blindsided by a written review that lacks context or explanation. What can a HR dept do if it cannot change people? Well, what it can do is influence, guide, facilitate, enable, persuade, coach, etc. It can also create a structure or environment that makes it easy for people to shift and learn themselves. This is the easiest way forward. 360 feedback tools can help you set up the backbones of all your feedback cycles (type of review, who feedback who, and reminders) and schedule them ahead. So, every time a session is coming up, a few clicks is all you need to do for the process to up and run on its own. No more sending mass emails for updates and reminders. 360-degree feedback is used predominantly for senior roles in large organisations, but can also be adopted more widely where it adds value. Engaging constructive wider feedback provides a more balanced and broader perspective. This more accurately and fairly assesses a person’s performance, and will reduce the influence of any subjective inputs such as favouritism and prejudices, etc. Comprehensive communication with participants is vital in the 360 degree process. All those involved must be fully aware of the purpose of carrying out the feedback survey as well as what it entails. Objectives must be made explicit and expectations of project outcomes informed and realistic. To minimise bias and maximise accuracy in responses employees should be aware of the context of the survey. Developing the leadership pipeline with regard to what is 360 degree feedback helps clarify key organisational messages.

Increased Employee Motivation

Over the years there have been several concerns about verbatim text on 360-degree instrument feedback. One concern is that a rater's handwriting may reveal his or her identity-can be overcome if the input process is PC-based (that is, if raters input their verbatim responses directly into the computer). However, in some cases, the nature of the comments or examples given may still allow the receiving manager to know, or to feel he or she knows, who provided the comments. An opportunity for transformation comes from 360 degree feedbackdata exposing your facade. This is the stuff you are hiding from others or pretending about. You may portray yourself as organised and efficient to a new client for instance. After a while they may get to know you and realise you are not quite as organised as they thought and be disappointed. As a general theme, the key thing to avoid when evaluating 360 data is overinterpretation. Let’s imagine that you felt perfectly OK and you had your blood pressure taken in a routine check-up. If it reads high then your GP could start you on the appropriate medication. However, it could have been a false reading, it may not have been “that high”, or there may have been a specific reason why your blood pressure was up at that time and there may not be an underlying condition at all – the instrument may be unreliable... The potential consequences of over-prescribing medication might however be fatal. If this is the first time running a 360 degree feedbacksession, you might consider developing and running a pilot process before rolling out the actual plan. To do this, nominate a small group of employees to form the test cases, and work through the process to better understand the overall impact and effectiveness it has. Most 360 degree feedbackprojects deliberately make it safe for reviewers, including the individuals themselves, to express themselves fully, although there are degrees of anonymity as noted earlier and there will be a natural level of comfortable confidentiality in this situation for every culture. Full expression may be considered dangerous or wrong, particularly in the predominantly Asian cultures where there are strong norms for what is OK to say and what is not OK. Analysis and decision making become easier when an understanding of 360 appraisal is woven into the organisational fabric.

Many organizations assume that increasing the assessment pool beyond one person will improve the accuracy of measurement. It does not. In fact, simplistic, informal approaches to multisource assessment are likely to multiply rather than reduce error. Errors enter from respondents' concerns about anonymity and factors such as friendship, competition bias, and collusion. When you extend 360 degree feedbackto multiple stakeholders, and not just one, you’ll more get more unbiased, objective, and therefore usable feedback. If you loop in varying stakeholders, especially those who have worked intimately on a project or on a day-to-day basis with an employee, you’ll gain a more accurate picture of their success. People tend to be quite candid when they provide input to colleagues, whether the information is to be used developmentally or for performance. If an organization truly fears the loss of developmental feedback, a practical solution is to divide the survey into two partsone developmental and one evaluativeso respondents have an opportunity to provide feedback on some items that are only developmental (and are not shared with the supervisor). 360 degree feedbackprovides an opportunity for individuals to see how their work and job performance is viewed by others. This feedback can be used for employee (professional) development. This process is often used for developmental purposes. Although, it is possible to combine 360-Degree Feedback with Performance Management Systems. The move from development to pay assessment in 360 degree systems may motivate some people to try to "game the system" to their favor by providing invalid responses. A response is invalid when the person makes a rating that tends to the scale extremesat the top or at the bottomalthough the probability that any single person is uniformly outstanding or terrible is nearly zero. The specificity/anonymity conundrum takes another turn when the idea of 360 degree feedback system is involved.

Career Development Programmes

Norm (or benchmark) data can be shown early on in the 360 degree appraisal – whether this is organisation-specific or an external set of comparative norm data. You need to consider inclusion of this data carefully and check acceptability as organisations vary in this respect. The data analysis and planning that precedes setting improvement goals is the most important link in the 360 degree evaluation process. The cognitive dissonance between the expected performance and the actual performance creates the targets for improvement. The evaluator in charge of helping the employee set the professional growth plans must combine and assess the types of feedback information and compare this information to the intended outcomes. Readers of the 360 degree feedbackwill be wanting and waiting to find out where they did worst so you may as well give them the answer sooner rather than later. [I remember inventing the term “lowlights” for this section after a trip to the hairdresser!] If you want a positive feel then you need to list fewer lowlights than highlights. The appropriate numbers could then be five highlights and four lowlights for a 50-item survey, seven highlights and five lowlights for a 90-item survey. This trick gives a positive feel regardless of the level of ratings. Check out extra facts about 360 assessment applications at this Wikipedia web page.

Related Articles:

Further Insight With Regard To 360-Degree evaluation initiatives
Supplementary Information On 360 assessment projects
Additional Findings With Regard To 360 degree assessment software systems
Further Insight About 360 feedback instruments
Background Information About 360 degree evaluation processes
Additional Insight About 360-Degree evaluation projects
Background Insight About 360 degree feedback systems

Back to the Home Page